14535 2011-10-21 21:29:04 +0000 Section 2.8.1. seems to define things backwards. We should definite the types of IDL attributes that reflect a given type of content attribute. 2012-07-18 18:41:57 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#common-dom-interfaces P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike rniwa contributor oldest_to_newest 58658 0 contributor 2011-10-21 21:29:04 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-dom-interfaces.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#common-dom-interfaces Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#common-dom-interfaces Comment: Section 2.8.1. seems to define things backwards. We should definite the types of IDL attributes that reflect a given type of content attribute. Posted from: 2620:0:1002:1000:225:ff:fef4:531f User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1 58867 1 ian 2011-10-25 05:02:13 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I wish it were that simple. Sadly, consider class="", className, and classList. Or the various width/height content and IDL attributes.