<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>14092</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-09-08 20:49:28 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>I don&apos;t think the phrase &quot;bubbling event listeners&quot; has any real meaning.  Would&apos;t non-capturing event listener be better here?  Handlers can be invoked during the bubbling or at_target phases, right?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-10-20 10:24:32 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#events</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>contributor</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>annevk</cc>
    
    <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>Ms2ger</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>56556</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2011-09-08 20:49:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/webappapis.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#events
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#events

Comment:
I don&apos;t think the phrase &quot;bubbling event listeners&quot; has any real meaning. 
Would&apos;t non-capturing event listener be better here?  Handlers can be invoked
during the bubbling or at_target phases, right?

Posted from: 66.114.38.251
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0a2) Gecko/20110907 Firefox/8.0a2</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>58462</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-19 23:06:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: We can try that.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>58467</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-19 23:09:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Checked in as WHATWG revision r6707.
Check-in comment: Try slightly more pedantically correct wording. Unfortunately DOM Core doesn&apos;t have good terminology for this either way.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6706&amp;to=6707</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>58532</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ms2ger">Ms2ger</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-20 10:24:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Anne, do we need better terminology here?</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>