14013 2011-09-03 07:32:10 +0000 "For the purposes of this requirement, ..." : Text nodes in style and script elements must not be counted as well. 2011-10-05 22:52:45 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#phrasing-content-0 P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 56239 0 contributor 2011-09-03 07:32:10 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#phrasing-content-0 Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#phrasing-content-0 Comment: "For the purposes of this requirement, ..." : Text nodes in style and script elements must not be counted as well. Posted from: 113.197.157.202 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.112 Safari/535.1 56312 1 ian 2011-09-04 20:57:34 +0000 Yeah this should probably be rephrased in an inductive manner. See also bug 14019. 57875 2 ian 2011-10-05 22:25:25 +0000 *** Bug 14019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 57876 3 ian 2011-10-05 22:51:07 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments and went beyond them quite a bit. 57877 4 contributor 2011-10-05 22:52:45 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6640. Check-in comment: Define the concept of 'palpable content' so that we can better define the 'should'-level requirement equivalent to HTML4's 'paragraphs must not be empty'. This might be overkill. On the other hand, this might be useful in the future in defining other requirements. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6639&to=6640