13903 2011-08-25 15:54:56 +0000 leftover text about "sidebar hyperlinks" 2012-02-14 20:30:00 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG HTML5 spec unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#following-hyperlinks-0 WGDecision P2 blocker --- 1 julian.reschke ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking rubys public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 55804 0 julian.reschke 2011-08-25 15:54:56 +0000 in 4.12.3 Following hyperlinks: "Otherwise, if the hyperlink is a sidebar hyperlink and the user agent implements a feature that can be considered a secondary browsing context, such a secondary browsing context may be selected as the browsing context to be navigated." This is probably leftover text that applied to the "sidebar" link relation (see bug 11183). Please remove. 58453 1 ian 2011-10-19 22:27:09 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: This text is required in order to properly define the rel=sidebar value registered in the wiki. (The wiki's definition refers to this definition.) 58541 2 julian.reschke 2011-10-20 13:39:23 +0000 Raised as <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/181>. 58550 3 ian 2011-10-20 17:17:45 +0000 When this decision is applied, how do you propose that the sidebar value in the wiki remain coherent? 59296 4 julian.reschke 2011-10-31 14:46:05 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > When this decision is applied, how do you propose that the sidebar value in the > wiki remain coherent? I propose that the definition of the link relation includes all information required to implement it (just like it's the case for any other complete definition of a link relation). 63098 5 rubys 2012-01-25 15:03:57 +0000 WG Decision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Jan/0131.html Change Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0192.html 63359 6 ian 2012-01-30 20:56:01 +0000 The decision has no "Details" section. Reassigning to chairs for clarification regarding what exactly it is they want me to do. 63361 7 julian.reschke 2012-01-30 21:17:35 +0000 (In reply to comment #6) > The decision has no "Details" section. Reassigning to chairs for clarification > regarding what exactly it is they want me to do. "Here, the term "sidebar hyperlink" is not specified anymore in the spec at all, and thus this paragraph should be removed." 63846 8 rubys 2012-02-07 16:10:05 +0000 (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > The decision has no "Details" section. Reassigning to chairs for clarification > > regarding what exactly it is they want me to do. > > "Here, the term "sidebar hyperlink" is not specified anymore in the spec > at all, and thus this paragraph should be removed." The chairs agree that this is the change that the proposal is asking for. 64117 9 contributor 2012-02-14 20:29:20 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6994. Check-in comment: Remove a paragraph from the W3C copy on chair request. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6993&to=6994