13883 2011-08-24 09:09:47 +0000 Index of methods and IDL attributes 2016-02-04 07:12:13 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG Editor tools unspecified Other other NEW http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#custom-handlers whatwg-resolved P3 normal --- 1 contributor robin eoconnor erika.doyle ian mike philipj public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking robin silviapfeiffer1 travil zcorpan public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 55753 0 contributor 2011-08-24 09:09:47 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/timers.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#custom-handlers Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#custom-handlers Comment: Make "registerProtocolHandler" and "registerContentHandler" appear in the TOC Posted from: 88.131.66.80 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50 58126 1 ian 2011-10-12 19:04:44 +0000 Why? Or even, how? The section title would be really long if it included both those method names, not to mention the other method names defined in that section... 58173 2 zcorpan 2011-10-13 05:02:04 +0000 Why? To make it easier to find (some sections have the relevant API in the ToC, e.g. designMode). But I guess that applies to any method. Maybe we should have an index of APIs as an appendix or something. 58770 3 ian 2011-10-24 18:20:13 +0000 An index would make a lot of sense. An IDL index would be something we can completely automate. The IDL blocks are computer-readable, and for each IDL field there's a corresponding <dfn>. If someone can hack together a quick script that just scans all the IDL blocks and extracts out all the methods and fields and forms an alphabetical index of them, I'd be happy to add that script to my publishing pipeline. 58875 4 ian 2011-10-25 05:13:43 +0000 (Please reassign to me if you have such a script.) 70266 5 contributor 2012-07-18 07:14:33 +0000 This bug was cloned to create bug 17898 as part of operation convergence.