13804 2011-08-17 11:05:11 +0000 Is normative rgb-icc() prototype wrong? 2011-08-17 11:05:11 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XSLFO XSL-FO 1.1 All All NEW P2 normal --- 1 tgraham tgraham xsl-editors oldest_to_newest 55290 0 tgraham 2011-08-17 11:05:11 +0000 The rgb-icc() prototype [1] in the normative HTML for XSL 1.1 is: color rgb-icc(numeric, numeric, numeric, NCName, numeric, numeric) However, the non-normative XML source [2] for XSL 1.1 contains: <proto name="rgb-icc" return-type="color"><arg type="numeric"/><arg type="numeric"/> <arg type="numeric"/><arg type="NCName"/><arg type="numeric"/><arg type="numeric" occur="rep"/></proto> I.e., the 'occur="rep"' on the last <arg> does not make it any different from an <arg> without it. In contrast 'occur="opt"' adds a "?" after the argument in the rendered prototype. E.g., in 'system-font()'. Was 'occur="rep"' supposed to add a "+" after the argument name in the rendered prototype? Regards, Tony Graham tgraham@mentea.net Consultant http://www.mentea.net Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- XML, XSL FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#expr-color-functions [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/xslspec.xml