13690 2011-08-06 06:40:15 +0000 method setItem(key, value) Why don't you fix a third optional parameter to set the "duration" of the key/value pair. If it is not set the key/value pair will not expire otherwise it will expire as it is set in the 'duration' parameter. 2011-08-08 22:01:25 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG Web Storage (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED LATER http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian art.barstow ayg ian mike Ms2ger public-webapps public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 54300 0 contributor 2011-08-06 06:40:15 +0000 Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/ Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top Comment: method setItem(key, value) Why don't you fix a third optional parameter to set the "duration" of the key/value pair. If it is not set the key/value pair will not expire otherwise it will expire as it is set in the 'duration' parameter. Posted from: 79.50.20.32 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1 54328 1 art.barstow 2011-08-06 11:58:31 +0000 *** Bug 13691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 54335 2 Ms2ger 2011-08-06 13:11:15 +0000 This sounds somewhat useful, but shouldn't be added unless there is strong implementer support, which I don't expect. 54388 3 art.barstow 2011-08-08 19:23:12 +0000 Perhaps save this for the next version of the spec? 54417 4 ian 2011-08-08 22:01:25 +0000 Yeah, this is a thing for a future version. IIRC there's a note in the spec source talking about this kind of thing already, actually.