<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>13657</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-08-04 02:16:55 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>exact number not imporant in range doesn&apos;t make sense.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-01-17 16:37:55 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>LC1 HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>a11y</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Cynthia Shelly">cyns</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Edward O&apos;Connor">eoconnor</assigned_to>
          <cc>annevk</cc>
    
    <cc>cooper</cc>
    
    <cc>eoconnor</cc>
    
    <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>laura.lee.carlson</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-a11y</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52297</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Cynthia Shelly">cyns</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-04 02:16:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Range says that the exact number is not important, but it renders as a slider.  There are sliders where the exact number is important. The user agent could pick which one to display based on the dimensions given in the style sheet. This would allow it to maintain the same resolution for the tick marks, despite the differences in width. This is very vague.  These different presentations should be controlled with CSS, not the browser.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53514</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-04 05:14:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>mass-move component to LC1</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54986</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-14 13:58:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: &lt;http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html&gt;.

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: It is not clear what needs to be done here. If you want an exact number, use type=number. The specification does include broad UI suggestions, to aid implementors, but does indeed not specify UI in detail because we do not want to constrain implementations. This is all by design.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61699</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Cynthia Shelly">cyns</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-16 21:45:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>So, I think that just removing the clause &quot;but with the caveat that the exact value is not important&quot; would make it less confusing. 

consider the scenario where I have a slider with 50 at one end and 100 at the other, and 4 tick marks in between, and step of 10.  In that case, the range does represent a set of specific numbers.  This is a pretty common design pattern for sliders on desktop apps.  The sentence above makes it sound like Range is not the right control for this.  If range is not the right control for this, what is?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61729</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-17 01:22:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Sounds reasonable to me.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63491</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2012-02-01 00:21:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The right control for that is type=number, as far as I can tell. If you use a slider, the user can&apos;t see the number, so obviously the number can&apos;t be important.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>70071</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-18 04:37:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This bug was cloned to create bug 17801 as part of operation convergence.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>76414</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Edward O&apos;Connor">eoconnor</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-16 17:32:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: No spec change.
Rationale: See comment 5.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>