<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1351</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-05-11 04:40:02 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>please have a feature to choose between XML 1.1 versus XML 1.0</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-06-09 00:04:15 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XQuery 1.0</component>
          <version>Last Call drafts</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>INVALID</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Don Chamberlin">chamberl</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3484</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2005-05-11 04:40:02 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xquery-review.html Comment ID: 6</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3196</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2005-05-18 19:09:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #0)
&gt; http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xquery-review.html Comment ID: 6

 It is only implementation-defined, whether XQuery supports XML 1.0 or XML 1.1
(defintion of implementation-defined). There should be a feature in XQuery which
allows to choose between these two versions of XML.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3197</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Rys">mrys</who>
    <bug_when>2005-05-18 19:21:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>What do you mean with &quot;provide a feature&quot;? 

Do you mean a prolog definition? This cannot be done at the query level 
because the semantics is keyed-off what the data model supports. You cannot 
run an XQuery supporting XML 1.1 in its syntax or semantics on XML 1.0 input 
documents or vice-versa without leading to inconsistencies. 

Providing this as implementation-defined behaviour, it is basically an option 
for implementations to provide one or the other (or trying to do both). So in 
this sense it is already a feature.

Best regards
Michael (speaking for myself)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2969</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Felix Sasaki">fsasaki</who>
    <bug_when>2005-05-30 08:30:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; What do you mean with &quot;provide a feature&quot;? 
&gt; 
&gt; Do you mean a prolog definition? This cannot be done at the query level 
&gt; because the semantics is keyed-off what the data model supports. You cannot 
&gt; run an XQuery supporting XML 1.1 in its syntax or semantics on XML 1.0 input 
&gt; documents or vice-versa without leading to inconsistencies. 
&gt; 
&gt; Providing this as implementation-defined behaviour, it is basically an option 
&gt; for implementations to provide one or the other (or trying to do both). So in 
&gt; this sense it is already a feature.
&gt; 
&gt; Best regards
&gt; Michael (speaking for myself)

consensus of the i18n-core-wg, telecon 27 may 2005: closed.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>