<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>13475</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-07-30 20:06:27 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Remove wrong example</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-08-04 05:14:28 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>LC1 HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Jirka Kosek">jirka</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>ayg</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>51831</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Jirka Kosek">jirka</who>
    <bug_when>2011-07-30 20:06:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In section 3.2.1 Semantics there is example showing necessity of using &lt;hgroup&gt; in situations where &lt;h2&gt; contains subheading. This example is simply misleading because in history &lt;h2&gt; was used for subheadings of headings expressed by &lt;h1&gt;. This misleading example should be removed even if the &lt;hgroup&gt; will remain in the spec after LC.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>51994</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Aryeh Gregor">ayg</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-02 16:00:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale:

The example is correct.  In the current HTML spec, any tag that&apos;s heading content starts a new section:

&quot;&quot;&quot;
The first element of heading content in an element of sectioning content represents the heading for that section. Subsequent headings of equal or higher rank start new (implied) sections, headings of lower rank start implied subsections that are part of the previous one. In both cases, the element represents the heading of the implied section.
&quot;&quot;&quot;
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html#headings-and-sections

Thus &lt;h1&gt;foo&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;h2&gt;bar&lt;/h2&gt; marks up a rank-one section whose contents begin with a rank-two subsection.  &lt;hgroup&gt;&lt;h1&gt;foo&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;h2&gt;bar&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/hgroup&gt; marks up the start of a rank-one section with no subsection (at least, it doesn&apos;t start with one).  An example of a case where &lt;h1&gt;foo&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;h2&gt;bar&lt;/h2&gt; would be correct is something like &lt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Egyptian_temple&amp;oldid=442681377&gt;, which has

  &lt;h2&gt;Functions&lt;/h2&gt;
  &lt;h3&gt;Religious&lt;/h3&gt; ...
  &lt;h3&gt;Economic and administrative&lt;/h3&gt; ...

In this case, the lack of an &lt;hgroup&gt; indicates that the entire contents of the &quot;Functions&quot; section consists of two subsections, &quot;Religious&quot; and &quot;Economic and administrative&quot;.

The example obviously will have to be fixed if &lt;hgroup&gt; is removed, but for now it&apos;s correct.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53499</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-04 05:14:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>mass-move component to LC1</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>