1341 2005-05-11 03:17:52 +0000 namespace-bindings and namespace nodes in terms of IRI 2007-02-25 23:13:26 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT Data Model 1.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED P2 minor --- 1350 1 fsasaki Norman.Walsh public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 3473 0 fsasaki 2005-05-11 03:17:52 +0000 http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 4 3276 1 Norman.Walsh 2005-05-17 13:55:39 +0000 On namespace-bindings accessors and namespace nodes In these sections you refer to URI in a rather colloquial way, e.g. "a set of prefix/URI pairs" (sec. 5.7) or "prefix, uri, parent" (sec. 6.4.1). Please refer to the definition of IRI (or anyURI, which is defined in terms of IRI) instead. Based on Martin's review, comment [30] 2975 2 fsasaki 2005-05-30 08:39:37 +0000 consensus of the i18n-core-wg, telecon 27 may 2005: approved by i18n-core-wg. 4380 3 Norman.Walsh 2005-06-29 16:04:22 +0000 Adopted the solution accepted for 1350: adding the following text to the terminology section of the Data Model document: "Within this specification, the term URI refers to a Universal Resource Identifier as defined in RFC 3986 and extended in RFC 3987 with the new name IRI. The term URI has been retained in preference to IRI to avoid introducing new names for concepts such as 'Base URI' that are defined or referenced across the whole family of XML specifications." Please let us know if you find this unsatisfactory. 14099 4 jim.melton 2007-02-25 23:13:26 +0000 Closing bug in spite of no response from commenter after almost two years