1339 2005-05-11 03:15:43 +0000 accessors of the data model sometimes should rely on IRI 2005-09-29 10:50:59 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT Data Model 1.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows XP CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1354 1 fsasaki Norman.Walsh public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 3471 0 fsasaki 2005-05-11 03:15:43 +0000 http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2 3274 1 Norman.Walsh 2005-05-17 13:53:46 +0000 The accessors of the data model The accessors sometimes rely on the data type xs:anyURI, i.e. baseURI (5.2), document-uri (5.4), unparsed-entity-system-id (5.16). xs:anyURI itself in its latest version is defined in terms of IRI. I would be good if you could refer to IRI itself, in addition to anyURI. Based on Martin's review, comment [20] 3190 2 fsasaki 2005-05-18 18:52:57 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2 Correction of my own comment: anyURI is so far not defined in terms of any:URI, hopefully it will be. 2973 3 fsasaki 2005-05-30 08:35:57 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 2 > > Correction of my own comment: anyURI is so far not defined in terms of any:URI, > hopefully it will be. consensus of the i18n-core-wg, telecon 27 may 2005: approved by i18n-core-wg. 2713 4 Norman.Walsh 2005-06-07 15:36:11 +0000 I think this should be closed per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-query-editors/2005Jun/0011.html Which says, briefly, that we'll apply a systematic change to the documents explaining why we use URI and how it relates to IRI. 4326 5 fsasaki 2005-06-22 07:42:06 +0000 consensus of the 1i8n-core-wg (telecon 21 May 2005): We regard the issue as closed. Best regards, Felix Sasaki