1335 2005-05-11 03:10:19 +0000 have a section on various notions of normalization 2005-06-28 16:07:16 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XPath 2.0 Last Call drafts PC Windows XP CLOSED WONTFIX P2 normal --- 1 fsasaki chamberl public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 3467 0 fsasaki 2005-05-11 03:10:19 +0000 http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xpath-review.html Comment ID: 3 3188 1 fsasaki 2005-05-18 18:45:33 +0000 Version with consensus from the i18n wg (telecon May 18): Sec. 2.2.3.1 "The operation tree is then normalized ...": Please give a unique term to the different form of normalizations you are addressing, e.g. "operation tree normaliztation". There are many different normalizations in this series of specifications, like operation tree normalization in this section, white space normalization (sec. 3.10.2, 4c), Character normalization (Charmod, NFC etc.), normalization as described in the formal semantics document, sec. 3.2.1, point 3, and sequence normalization as described in the serialization specification, sec. 2. These should be very clearly distinguished and labeled. A section which summarizes the various kinds of normalization would be helpful. 2745 2 chamberl 2005-06-11 04:41:32 +0000 Felix, This comment was discussed jointly by the Query and XSLT working groups on May 19, 2005. The working groups believe that each usage of the term "normalize" in our documents is made clear by the context in which it appears. The working groups decided not to make any changes to the XPath and XQuery documents in response to this comment. Please let us know whether you find this resolution to be acceptable. Regards, Don Chamberlin (for the Query and XSLT working groups) 4369 3 fsasaki 2005-06-28 16:07:16 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > Felix, > This comment was discussed jointly by the Query and XSLT working groups on May > 19, 2005. The working groups believe that each usage of the term "normalize" in > our documents is made clear by the context in which it appears. The working > groups decided not to make any changes to the XPath and XQuery documents in > response to this comment. > > Please let us know whether you find this resolution to be acceptable. > consensus of the i18n-core wg (telecon 28 June 2005): We accept your resolution and regard this comment as closed. Regards, Felix Sasaki