13130 2011-07-04 12:35:03 +0000 accesskey handling in the spec doesn't match the implementations 2011-08-17 03:47:26 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified PC Linux RESOLVED FIXED a11y P2 normal --- 1 bugs ian ian jan.varga laura.lee.carlson mike public-html-a11y public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 50641 0 1010 bugs 2011-07-04 12:35:03 +0000 Created attachment 1010 testcase Per the spec accesskey is registered to some element even if the element isn't the document tree. Only changing the accesskey attribute or moving the element to another document should change the assigned access key. That is not what browsers seem to do. If element isn't in the document tree, one cannot activate the element using accesskey. (Tested on Gecko and Webkit) So, the spec should mention that the elements which aren't in the document tree should not have assigned access key. 53850 1 mike 2011-08-04 05:33:49 +0000 mass-move component to LC1 55262 2 ian 2011-08-17 03:47:03 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: They still have an assigned access key, otherwise the actual assigned key might change as the element is moved around, and scripts couldn't find the assigned key's label while the element was briefly outside of a document. However, you are entirely correct that those keys should be ignored when pressed, shouldn't be exposed in the UA UI, etc. I've fixed that. 55263 3 contributor 2011-08-17 03:47:26 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6480. Check-in comment: Make sure commands aren't exposed when not in a document. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6479&to=6480 1010 2011-07-04 12:35:03 +0000 2011-07-04 12:35:03 +0000 testcase ak.html text/html 709 bugs PGh0bWw+CiAgPGhlYWQ+CiAgICA8c2NyaXB0PgogICAgZnVuY3Rpb24gdGVzdCgpIHsKICAgICAg dmFyIGEgPSBkb2N1bWVudC5jcmVhdGVFbGVtZW50KCJhIik7CiAgICAgIGEuc2V0QXR0cmlidXRl KCJocmVmIiwgIiNkdW1teSIpOwogICAgICBhLnNldEF0dHJpYnV0ZSgiYWNjZXNza2V5IiwgImEi KTsKICAgICAgYS5vbmNsaWNrID0gZnVuY3Rpb24oKSB7IGFsZXJ0KCJMaW5rIHdhcyBhY3RpdmF0 ZWQhIik7IHNldFRpbWVvdXQoZnVuY3Rpb24oKSB7YS5wYXJlbnROb2RlLnJlbW92ZUNoaWxkKGEp O30sIDUwKTsgfTsKICAgICAgYS50ZXh0Q29udGVudCA9ICIuIjsKICAgICAgZG9jdW1lbnQuYm9k eS5hcHBlbmRDaGlsZChhKTsKICAgIH0KICAgIDwvc2NyaXB0PgogIDwvaGVhZD4KICA8Ym9keSBv bmxvYWQ9InRlc3QoKSI+CiAgICBQZXIgSFRNTCBzcGVjIChidXQgbm90IHdoYXQgYnJvd3NlcnMg ZG8pIGFjdGl2YXRpbmcgYWNjZXNza2V5ICgnYScgaW4gdGhpcyB0ZXN0KQogICAgc2hvdWxkIGFj dGl2YXRlIGEgbGluayBldmVuIHdoZW4gdGhlIGVsZW1lbnQgaXMgcmVtb3ZlZCBmcm9tIGRvY3Vt ZW50IHRyZWUuPGJyPgogICAgU28sIGFjdGl2YXRlIGFjY2Vzc2tleSAnYScgYW5kIHlvdSBzaG91 bGQgZ2V0IGFuIGFsZXJ0KCJsaW5rIHdhcyBhY3RpdmF0ZWQiKS4KICAgIFRoZW4gdHJ5IHRoYXQg YWdhaW4uCiAgPC9ib2R5Pgo8L2h0bWw+Cg==