12942 2011-06-12 06:23:27 +0000 Time element specification phrasing error (Section 4.6.10) 2011-10-29 05:43:10 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED WONTFIX <time> P2 normal --- 13240 1 lucas.sa ian everett ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking rgf748 public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 49480 0 lucas.sa 2011-06-12 06:23:27 +0000 On the specification of the time element[1], there is an error at the part it explains what happens when the pubdate attr. is not specified: "If the element does not need a date, *and the datetime attribute is present*, then the attribute's value must be a valid date or time string. If the element does not need a date, *but the datetime attribute is not present*, then the element's textContent must be a valid date or time string in content." Instead, it should be: "If the element does not need a date, *but the datetime attribute is present*, then the attribute's value must be a valid date or time string. If the element does not need a date, *and the datetime attribute is not present*, then the element's textContent must be a valid date or time string in content." [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-time-element 52488 1 mike 2011-08-04 05:01:56 +0000 mass-moved component to LC1 57085 2 ian 2011-09-21 18:25:34 +0000 I think we're going to move away from <time> so this will likely become a non-issue. 58684 3 everett 2011-10-22 01:09:09 +0000 @Ian Can you please explain what you mean by "...move away from..."? 59183 4 ian 2011-10-29 05:43:10 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: see bug 13240 Rationale: I've removed <time> from the spec entirely, including the offending spec text above.