12891 2011-06-05 19:36:30 +0000 to RDF conversion should be in agreement with schema.org 2011-06-08 19:57:53 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED DUPLICATE 12713 P2 normal --- 1 giovanni.tummarello contributor ayg geoffers+w3cbugs ian julian.reschke mike philipj public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 49206 0 giovanni.tummarello 2011-06-05 19:36:30 +0000 Schema.org using microdata shows an RDF which makes sense (e.g. the URIs are correctly the same as those poposed on schema.org)see http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html the RDFa example (just convert it to rdf) but if the proposed algorithm is used the URIS would be really strange and incompatible with these. "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/microdata#http://example.com/a%23:q%20r". it is really important to fix this algorithm since we do need implementations asap also driven by schema.org 49254 1 philipj 2011-06-07 10:25:10 +0000 From http://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html it doesn't look like they are using microdata at all. See also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12713 49332 2 ian 2011-06-08 19:57:53 +0000 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12713 ***