12881 2011-06-03 13:19:28 +0000 "is expected to hide it" is a bit vague. Clarify that it means display:none. 2011-09-22 23:43:56 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#display-types P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian dbaron eoconnor ian jackalmage mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking zcorpan public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 49151 0 contributor 2011-06-03 13:19:28 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/rendering.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#display-types Comment: "is expected to hide it" is a bit vague. Clarify that it means display:none. Posted from: 85.227.154.77 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.11 54103 1 mike 2011-08-04 05:36:06 +0000 mass-move component to LC1 54617 2 ian 2011-08-10 19:23:56 +0000 Would "is expected to force its 'display' property to compute to 'none'" be ok? Or should it just be defined as a replaced element with dimensions 0x0? 54625 3 dbaron 2011-08-10 19:54:05 +0000 Well, our UA style sheet has: audio:not([controls]) { display: none; } It's not clear to me why it needs to be magical and non-overridable, but display:none sounds fine. 54687 4 zcorpan 2011-08-11 11:25:45 +0000 It should be non-overridable because authors may want to style audio as display:block but only expect it to affect audio with controls. It's not even defined what should be rendered when audio without controls when it has display other than none (do you render the fallback? or a zero-dimension replaced element? something else?). 54688 5 zcorpan 2011-08-11 11:26:57 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > Would "is expected to force its 'display' property to compute to 'none'" be ok? Yes. (Also noscript and maybe other things use that phrase as well.) > Or should it just be defined as a replaced element with dimensions 0x0? That's not how it's implemented today. 57206 6 ian 2011-09-22 23:42:06 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments. 57207 7 contributor 2011-09-22 23:43:56 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6567. Check-in comment: Better define 'hide' in the rendering section. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6566&to=6567