12679 2011-05-18 09:06:56 +0000 In http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20080707#l-26 you argued that most HTML attributes don't use hyphen, so for consistency cross-origin should be crossorigin 2011-08-04 05:12:33 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-img-cross-origin P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ayg ian jackalmage julian.reschke kbr mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking zcorpan public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 48584 0 contributor 2011-05-18 09:06:56 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/embedded-content-1.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-img-cross-origin Comment: In http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20080707#l-26 you argued that most HTML attributes don't use hyphen, so for consistency cross-origin should be crossorigin Posted from: 88.131.66.80 by simonp@opera.com User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.8.131 Version/11.10 48706 1 ian 2011-05-23 20:59:31 +0000 With cross-origin, there are three attributes with hyphens, if we ignore data-*. If we include data-*, there's an infinite number of attributes with hyphens, so most of them do have them... I think this is a bit bigger of a problem for element names than attribute names. But I'll change it if I'm alone in thinking it reads better with the hyphen... what do people think? <img src="..." alt="..." cross-origin="..." title="..." class="..."> <img src="..." alt="..." crossorigin="..." title="..." class="..."> 48712 2 jackalmage 2011-05-23 21:19:26 +0000 The two old attributes that use hyphens (http-equiv and accept-charset) are a weird legacy. The two classes of new attributes that use hyphens (data-* and aria-*) represent an open class of attributes, and the hyphen serves a useful purpose of representing that the preceding string is a common prefix (already established by CSS as a common pattern). Many other attributes that could potentially read better with hyphens, like formnovalidate (form-no-validate?) are hyphenless. For consistency, let's drop the hyphen. I don't want to have to remember any more exceptions to the no-hyphen rule than I'm already forced to. 48713 3 ian 2011-05-23 21:29:10 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments. 48714 4 contributor 2011-05-23 21:29:27 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6147. Check-in comment: Change cross-origin='' to crossorigin='' since people don't seem to like hyphens. Poor hyphens. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6146&to=6147 53305 5 mike 2011-08-04 05:12:33 +0000 mass-move component to LC1