12656 2011-05-14 06:35:13 +0000 If a dt and dd are wrapped in a div, are they excluded from being a group in that dl? This statement is not clear with regards to this: "If a dl element contains non-whitespace text nodes, or elements other than dt and dd, then those elements or text node 2011-08-13 05:38:41 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-dl-element P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ian mike Ms2ger public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 48514 0 contributor 2011-05-14 06:35:13 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/grouping-content.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-dl-element Comment: If a dt and dd are wrapped in a div, are they excluded from being a group in that dl? This statement is not clear with regards to this: "If a dl element contains non-whitespace text nodes, or elements other than dt and dd, then those elements or text nodes do not form part of any groups in that dl." Posted from: 72.197.251.217 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/12.0.742.30 Safari/534.30 48517 1 Ms2ger 2011-05-14 18:47:37 +0000 Should probably make it clear that "contains" here only includes children, not descendants. 53403 2 mike 2011-08-04 05:13:31 +0000 mass-move component to LC1 54872 3 ian 2011-08-13 05:37:34 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with comment 1. The answer to the original comment is yes, they are not part of a group; such a document would be non-conforming anyway. The spec seems pretty clear about this. 54873 4 contributor 2011-08-13 05:38:41 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6444. Check-in comment: wording tweaks to avoid 'contains' which can be interpreted as referencing descendents rather than children http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6443&to=6444