12613 2011-05-06 00:09:10 +0000 [registries] spec guidance on adding new link types to the microformats wiki page does not match the format of that wiki page 2011-08-09 23:59:39 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P3 normal --- 1 mike ian eoconnor hsivonen ian julian.reschke mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 48134 0 mike 2011-05-06 00:09:10 +0000 Problem: The spec currently says, "Anyone is free to edit the Microformats wiki existing-rel-values page at any time to add a type. Extension types must be specified with the following information:", and then has a list with some categories of information that are expected to be provided for each link type; for example, "Keyword", "Effect on", "Brief description", "Synonyms". But the format of the wiki pages does not match those categorizations. http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/links.html#other-link-types http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values Suggestion solution: I suggest we don't bother trying to make the language of the spec here match the wiki closely, but instead, drop then entire list from the spec and replace it with a single sentence such as "To add new types to that wiki page, follow the instructions on that page.", and leave it to the maintainers of that page to provide guidance on how to add new information to it. (There are in fact no existing instructions on that page, but hopefully the maintainers can add some.) 52119 1 hsivonen 2011-08-03 06:50:01 +0000 I think the best way to address this without reopening the Decision is to make the link point more precisely to http://microformats.org/wiki/existing-rel-values#HTML5_link_type_extensions 52473 2 mike 2011-08-04 05:01:48 +0000 mass-moved component to LC1 54507 3 ian 2011-08-09 23:59:22 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with comment 1. I expect this will change again. I think we should move to a model where the registry is tentative and the proven values move into the spec. This will probably mean a massive simplification of what the spec says is needed of the registry. 54508 4 contributor 2011-08-09 23:59:39 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6397. Check-in comment: Update link to be more specific http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6396&to=6397