<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>12256</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-03-06 14:19:48 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>&lt;input type=number value=&quot;&quot;&gt; should be valid?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-08-04 05:02:39 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>LC1 HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-input-value</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>contributor</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>annevk</cc>
    
    <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>jonas</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>philipj</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46434</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-06 14:19:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-input-element.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-input-value

Comment:
&lt;input type=number value=&quot;&quot;&gt; should be valid?

Posted from: 81.234.240.242 by philip@foolip.org
User agent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.8.115 Version/11.10</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46435</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Philip Jägenstedt">philipj</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-06 14:23:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From http://validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fhtml5.org%2Ftools%2Fweb-apps-tracker :

&quot;Error: Bad value  for attribute value on element input: The empty string is not a valid floating point number.&quot;

The offending markup:

&lt;input id=from type=number min=1 value=&quot;&quot; name=from required&gt;

The reason this was output was the template code in trackerlib.py:

&lt;input id=from type=number min=1 value=&quot;%s&quot; name=from required&gt;

Unless there&apos;s any harm in allowing value=&quot;&quot; here, maybe we should allow it?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46436</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Philip Jägenstedt">philipj</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-06 14:34:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Anne found the relevant part of the spec: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/number-state.html#number-state

&quot;The value attribute, if specified, must have a value that is a valid floating point number.&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46446</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Anne">annevk</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-07 07:07:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This also applies to type=date and several others. I think we should allow the empty string value everywhere.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46897</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Jonas Sicking (Not reading bugmail)">jonas</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-22 00:32:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Agreed. Given that the empty value is a valid value (unless the element is required of course), it seems surprising that the empty attribute value isn&apos;t valid.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>48291</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-07 19:07:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Concurred with reporter&apos;s comments.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>48292</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-07 19:07:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Checked in as WHATWG revision r6118.
Check-in comment: Allow controls to be given a missing value explicitly (&lt;input type=number value=&apos;&apos;&gt; for instance)
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6117&amp;to=6118</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52562</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-04 05:02:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>mass-moved component to LC1</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>