<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>12255</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-03-06 14:18:13 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>option.label and option.value could be consistent</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-09-22 17:39:54 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>LC1 HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Mounir Lamouri">mounir</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>jonas</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46433</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Mounir Lamouri">mounir</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-06 14:18:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>For the moment, the &apos;label&apos; of an option element is its label attribute if present, otherwise its textContent. The &apos;value&apos; of an option element is its value attribute if present, otherwise its textContent.
The label IDL attribute reflects the label attribute and the value IDL attribute (getter) returns the value attribute if present, otherwise the textContent.

I deplore the lack of consistency here: I would have understand that option.value and option.label reflects the content attribute but I don&apos;t understand why the former doesn&apos;t while the later does.

I think the API would be easier to use if option.label was working like option.value and I wonder if there would be real compat issues if this change was made. (I would say it doesn&apos;t)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>48290</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-07 18:55:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: Implement it the way that makes sense and if nothing breaks, reopen the bug. I&apos;d be more than happy to change this; as specced, it&apos;s just supposed to be backwards-compatible.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>48869</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Mounir Lamouri">mounir</who>
    <bug_when>2011-05-27 15:28:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reopening because Firefox 7 might implement this if we don&apos;t catch any compat issues in the next few weeks.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52395</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-04 05:01:02 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>mass-moved component to LC1</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54487</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-09 22:21:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Mounir: Any news on this?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54493</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Mounir Lamouri">mounir</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-09 22:44:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #4)
&gt; Mounir: Any news on this?

It&apos;s in Firefox 7. IOW, this is currently in the Aurora and Nightly channels and will move to Beta next week.
See: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659596

We got no report so far but it might be too early to make any conclusion.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57163</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-09-22 17:38:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Implementation seems to be safe so far, so let&apos;s try it. (Could still change.)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57164</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2011-09-22 17:39:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Checked in as WHATWG revision r6560.
Check-in comment: Make option.label and option.value more consistent.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6559&amp;to=6560</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>