12131 2011-02-18 23:09:41 +0000 Assert vs Assertion 2011-03-24 08:07:07 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only PC Windows NT CLOSED FIXED resolved P2 normal --- 1 mike David_E3 cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 45835 0 mike 2011-02-18 23:09:41 +0000 In Part 1 3.16.3 clause 1 we read: 1 With the exception of <enumeration>, <pattern>, and <assert>, the [children] of <restriction> do not contain more than one element information item with the same name. Here <assert> should be <assertion>. 46379 1 cmsmcq 2011-03-04 23:57:31 +0000 Agreed. The change needs to be made both in the normative prose and in the accompanying note. I think nothing else needs to change, so I'm tentatively marking this 'needs review'. More explicitly, the proposal is to make clause 1 of Schema Representation Constraint: Simple Type Definition Representation OK read: 1 No two elements among the [children] of <restriction> have the same expanded name in the Schema (xs) namespace, unless that expanded name is one of xs:enumeration, xs:pattern, or xs:assertion. Note: That is, most of the facets for simple types defined by this specification are forbidden to occur more than once. But <enumeration>, <pattern>, and <assertion> may occur multiple times, and facets defined in other namespaces and made available as extensions to this specification may occur multiple times. 46815 2 David_E3 2011-03-18 16:48:27 +0000 RESOLVED: adopt the change. 46939 3 cmsmcq 2011-03-23 19:42:56 +0000 The decision reported in comment 2 has been implemented and the change integrated into the status-quo document. Michael, would you do the honors, please?