12130 2011-02-18 22:48:19 +0000 [IBM] test ECDwildcard s3_8_6v01 2011-07-29 14:53:29 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Test Suite IBM tests 2006-11-06 PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mike cmsmcq David_E3 public-xml-schema-testsuite oldest_to_newest 45832 0 mike 2011-02-18 22:48:19 +0000 The documentation for this test seems to describe exactly what the test is doing: "any element instance which matches the wildcard is required to have a governing type definition compatible with the type assigned by the local element declarations matched by the element's expanded name." The instance document (specifically, the second <x> element) appears to violate this condition, so it is unclear why it is tagged as valid. The confusion may be something to do with the spurious xsi:schemaLocation attribute on the instance document, which refers to a namespace "a" that is not actually used in the test, with a reference to a schema document whose targetNamespace is actually "b". 51759 1 David_E3 2011-07-29 14:27:07 +0000 should have been a negative test, changed result. 51767 2 cmsmcq 2011-07-29 14:53:29 +0000 Resetting the 'component' field of this bug report appropriately.