12022 2011-02-09 14:12:58 +0000 Shouldn't the iframe element be made into a void element? You're saying its descendents should 'represent nothing'. 2011-08-04 05:00:27 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-iframe-element P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 45326 0 contributor 2011-02-09 14:12:58 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-iframe-element.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-iframe-element Comment: Shouldn't the iframe element be made into a void element? You're saying its descendents should 'represent nothing'. Posted from: 80.229.207.135 46287 1 ian 2011-03-04 01:55:30 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Legacy constrains us. 52334 2 mike 2011-08-04 05:00:27 +0000 mass-moved component to LC1