11999 2011-02-07 12:30:28 +0000 poster frame algo doesn't handle absent poster attribute 2011-08-04 05:35:06 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified Other other RESOLVED DUPLICATE 12354 http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#poster-frame P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ian mike Ms2ger philipj public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 45175 0 contributor 2011-02-07 12:30:28 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#poster-frame Comment: poster frame algo doesn't handle absent poster attribute Posted from: 91.181.37.224 47823 1 ian 2011-04-29 23:26:07 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: If you're referring to the algorithm that starts "If the specified resource is to be used..." then it isn't relevant when the attribute is missing, since it only applies when there is a specified resource. 47835 2 Ms2ger 2011-05-01 20:07:18 +0000 Some clarification would be welcome, then. Does "the specified resource" refer to the poster or the video? Also, the algorithm should be run "when the poster attribute is [...] removed", so it seems like it should handle being run without a poster attribute. 48329 3 Ms2ger 2011-05-08 14:27:15 +0000 So it's correct when I complain, and wrong when you do? I'm confused... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12354 *** 53985 4 mike 2011-08-04 05:35:06 +0000 mass-move component to LC1