<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>11903</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-01-28 11:01:20 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>i think it&apos;d be more convenient if explicit sections could be children of implicit sections, so you can use implicit sections in general and throw in an &lt;aside&gt; somewhere without breaking the outline. now if you want to throw in an &lt;aside&gt;, you need to ch</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-01-23 09:58:49 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>HTML WG</product>
          <component>LC1 HTML5 spec</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#outlines</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P3</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>contributor</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</assigned_to>
          <cc>ian</cc>
    
    <cc>kennyluck</cc>
    
    <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-admin</cc>
    
    <cc>public-html-wg-issue-tracking</cc>
    
    <cc>zcorpan</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="HTML WG Bugzilla archive list">public-html-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>44825</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="">contributor</who>
    <bug_when>2011-01-28 11:01:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/sections.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#outlines

Comment:
i think it&apos;d be more convenient if explicit sections could be children of
implicit sections, so you can use implicit sections in general and throw in an
&lt;aside&gt; somewhere without breaking the outline. now if you want to throw in an
&lt;aside&gt;, you need to change everything to also throw in explicit &lt;section&gt;s
everywhere just to make the outline as it was before throwing in the &lt;aside&gt;

Posted from: 85.227.154.141 by simonp@opera.com</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>45846</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ian &apos;Hixie&apos; Hickson">ian</who>
    <bug_when>2011-02-18 23:52:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>EDITOR&apos;S RESPONSE: This is an Editor&apos;s Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: The problem is that if you do that then it becomes essentially impossible to automatically style &lt;h1&gt;, and any other manipulation of sections that relies on the DOM and skips out on implementing the (rather complex) outline algorithm can&apos;t even get the basics right.

I agree that it is problematic when you mix the two models at a sibling level. Not sure what can be done about that.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53628</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael[tm] Smith">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2011-08-04 05:15:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>mass-move component to LC1</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>