11837 2011-01-22 16:37:40 +0000 remove Matroska example 2011-08-04 05:14:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-source-element P2 normal --- 1 julian.reschke ian annevk eric.carlson ian mike philipj public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking singer public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 44614 0 julian.reschke 2011-01-22 16:37:40 +0000 Please remove the Matroska example; the type isn't registered, and the furthermore the specification (at <http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/notes.html>) doesn't mention a "codecs" parameter. 45672 1 ian 2011-02-16 09:06:27 +0000 Eric, Dave, foolip, any advice on this? 45675 2 philipj 2011-02-16 09:15:03 +0000 Since I assume no one is ever going to support Matroska in <video>, I wouldn't mind removing it. I don't agree with the reason given though, I think we should have a video/webm example, even though that also isn't registered. 45680 3 singer 2011-02-16 09:25:05 +0000 seems it would be easy to update the MIME statement on the indicated page to add "the codecs MIME parameter may be used, as in RFC 4285. For a Matroska file, the value is a list of CodecIDs, for example as in http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/codecid/index.html" Then we get both a useful example and documentation. 45686 4 philipj 2011-02-16 09:44:40 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > seems it would be easy to update the MIME statement on the indicated page to > add "the codecs MIME parameter may be used, as in RFC 4285. For a Matroska > file, the value is a list of CodecIDs, for example as in > http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/codecid/index.html" Then we get both a > useful example and documentation. I don't think that would be appropriate. If someone ever wanted to support Matroska, it's unlikely they'd want to have codecs=V_THEORA instead of codecs=theora. As a quickfix, just remove the example. 47897 5 ian 2011-05-03 20:24:04 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments. 47899 6 contributor 2011-05-03 20:25:01 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r6057. Check-in comment: matroska doesn't define this yet, apparently http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6056&to=6057 53500 7 mike 2011-08-04 05:14:28 +0000 mass-move component to LC1