11704 2011-01-09 11:45:10 +0000 step 5: <link rel=icon> 2012-07-18 18:48:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#atom P3 normal Unsorted 1 contributor ian ian mike philipj contributor oldest_to_newest 43960 0 contributor 2011-01-09 11:45:10 +0000 Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/links.html Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#atom Comment: step 5: <link rel=icon> Posted from: 81.234.240.182 by philip@foolip.org 43961 1 philipj 2011-01-09 11:49:03 +0000 1. What if there are multiple <link rel=icon> elements? 2. URL should be in href="", not text content (other instances of this problem were fixed in http://html5.org/r/5235) 43962 2 philipj 2011-01-09 13:41:02 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > 2. URL should be in href="", not text content (other instances of this problem > were fixed in http://html5.org/r/5235) Sorry, I misread the spec, it adds <icon>URL</icon>, not <link rel=icon>URL</link> as I thought. 43963 3 philipj 2011-01-09 13:47:11 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > 1. What if there are multiple <link rel=icon> elements? As for this, the Atom spec states, for some reason, that "atom:feed elements MUST NOT contain more than one atom:icon element.", so picking the same as a browser would (first or last?) seems reasonable. Unfortunately, http://feedvalidator.org/ complains about "Unregistered link relationship" if trying to use <link rel="icon" href="URL"/> in Atom, or that would have been a workaround. 45227 4 ian 2011-02-08 01:06:48 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: #1: clarified that it's the first such element that is used. #2: invalid per comment 2. I'd do something more clever with the icon, but I figure we'll wait to see whether enough people really care before going crazy here. 45228 5 contributor 2011-02-08 01:07:19 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r5849. Check-in comment: clarify which rel=icon you use when converting to Atom, if there are many http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5848&to=5849