11701 2011-01-09 01:42:45 +0000 [XQTS] incorrect expectation of XPST0003 (parse error) 2016-04-12 14:41:23 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Query Test Suite XML Query Test Suite unspecified All Windows 3.1 RESOLVED MOVED P2 normal --- 1 jmdyck benjie.nguyen oneil public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 43948 0 jmdyck 2011-01-09 01:42:45 +0000 Test-cases: modules-pub-priv-{1,2,3,4} and map-903 all have <expected-error spec-version="1.0">XPST0003</expected-error> but this is incorrect, as the queries are all valid instances of the XQuery 1.0 grammar. Those lines should be deleted from the catalog. (All the test-cases also have <expected-error spec-version="1.0">XQST0031</expected-error> which is correct.) Also, test-case K2-DirectConElem-53 has <expected-error>XPST0003</expected-error> which is correct for XQuery 1.0, but not 3.0. The query is: namespace {"p"} {"abc"} which is a valid instance of the 3.0 grammar. (But here I'm not sure what the expected results *should* be.) 44709 1 benjie.nguyen 2011-01-25 14:08:08 +0000 Hi Michael, could you open another bug for the second part of your report (i.e. correct 1.0 syntax but wrong 3.0 syntax), because I think that it might stem some discussion whereas the first part of the bug report is rather straightforward. For the first part of your bug report XQST0003 may have been blindly added on many cases where XQST0031 was raised. Since Mike Kay is the author of this bug maybe he can give his rationale. 44722 2 jmdyck 2011-01-25 20:02:22 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > > could you open another bug for the second part of your report Okay, that's now Bug 11866. > (i.e. correct 1.0 syntax but wrong 3.0 syntax), (It's actually the other way round.) 125832 3 oneil 2016-04-12 14:41:23 +0000 This bug has been resolved against the QT3 test suite therefore I am marking it as resolved.