1157 2005-03-04 13:38:54 +0000 ICS needs more than y/n/n-a 2005-04-28 11:53:51 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified QA QASpec-GL LC-2004-11-22 All All RESOLVED REMIND http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0013.html P2 normal --- 1041 1 dom karl karl oldest_to_newest 3992 0 dom 2005-03-04 13:38:54 +0000 Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/specgl-ics 1) The Implementation Conformance Statement uses URIs of the form ./#foo which will only work correctly if the implementation conformance statement for each specification lives under http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ For a template, these should be converted to absolute links. 2) "The table includes spaces for scoring each checkpoint, "yes" (satisfied), "no" (not satisfied), "n/a" (not applicable)." It should be encouraged to link to the part of the spec that demonstrates each claim of conformance, as well as just marking yes or no or n/a. 3993 1 dom 2005-03-04 13:39:17 +0000 Relates to bug #1041 4005 2 dom 2005-03-04 17:56:50 +0000 Encourage WG to link to the appropriate part of the specification that demonstrates each claim of conformance. Add a Comments column. ACTION: Part of #1041, being addressed by Lynne RESOLUTION: agree with the TAG, making appropriate changes to the text 3914 3 dom 2005-03-21 13:37:21 +0000 Dave's proposal and follow-up discussions http://www.w3.org/mid/OF17DB1FE9.EA4D68FA-ON85256FC2.00774008-85256FC2.007823F4@lotus.com 3921 4 dom 2005-03-21 14:05:57 +0000 ignore comment above, was for another issue 3835 5 dom 2005-04-08 09:25:16 +0000 New editor version of ICS has a comments column, absolute links to the spec, and verbiage asking users to link back to the relevant spec parts. 3679 6 dom 2005-04-28 11:53:51 +0000 setting version to LC in case of future use