11538 2010-12-11 22:34:29 +0000 XQST0045 in "2.5.4.7 Function Test" 2011-02-05 22:33:29 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XQuery 3.0 Member-only Editors Drafts PC Linux CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 jonathan.robie jonathan.robie jim.melton public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 43282 0 jonathan.robie 2010-12-11 22:34:29 +0000 <quote source="2.5.4.7 Function Test"> Implementations MAY define further annotation assertions, whose behaviour is implementation-defined. Implementations MAY provide a way for users to create their own annotation assertions. Implementations and users SHOULD avoid creating new annotation assertions in the following reserved namespaces [err:XQST0045]: * http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace * http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema * http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance * http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions </quote> When is XQST0045 raised? If an implementation decides to ignore the SHOULD, it presumably does not raise the error, and the text should be rewritten to clarify this. If a user decides to ignore the SHOULD, is it an error or not? Or is it implementation-defined or implementation-dependent? This is currently fuzzy. 44979 1 jonathan.robie 2011-02-01 17:58:26 +0000 This is fixed in the current working draft. However, I missed this: <quote> Implementations and users SHOULD avoid creating new annotations in the following reserved namespaces [err:XQST0045]: http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/math </quote> I will fix that one also. 45153 2 jim.melton 2011-02-05 22:33:29 +0000 The WG agreed with your fix, so I'm marking this bug CLOSED.