<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1151</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-03-04 02:57:06 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Positive statements for non applicability of depreaction</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-04-28 11:53:51 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>QA</product>
          <component>QASpec-GL</component>
          <version>LC-2004-11-22</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>REMIND</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0007.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Karl Dubost">karl</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3982</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-03-04 02:57:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The specification requires &quot;Identify deprecated features.&quot; Even in
version 1 of a specification? (Yes, it can happen that version 1
formalizes industry practice, so defines and immediately deprecates
something).

Conversely, is it required to state explicitly &quot;there are no deprecated
features&quot; to meet this requirement? Otherwise, its hard to distinguish
between a pass (there are no deprecated features listed) and a fail
(deprecated features are there, but were not identified as such).

We suggest that a bullet &quot;It has no deprecated features&quot; be added to the
bulleted list under &quot;Conformance criteria&quot;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3983</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-03-04 02:58:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Working Group agreed to require a positive statement when there are no
deprecated feature, with a modulation for version 1 of a specification.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3915</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-03-21 13:50:02 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>added in &quot;what does it mean&quot; re deprecated features:
&quot;If the specified technology has already been published in a previous version of
the specification, indicate which features from the previous version have been
deprecated or state that none were deprecated in the conformance section&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3676</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-04-28 11:53:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>setting version to LC in case of future use</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>