<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>11375</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-11-22 12:43:09 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-03-08 01:19:26 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WebAppsWG</product>
          <component>Indexed Database API</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Jeremy Orlow">jorlow</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jeremy Orlow">jorlow</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
    
    <cc>public-webapps</cc>
          
          <qa_contact>public-webapps-bugzilla</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>42694</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Jeremy Orlow">jorlow</who>
    <bug_when>2010-11-22 12:43:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The error codes specced in IDBDatabaseException&apos;s interface need to be redone.  They currently overlap with existing exception error codes and use 0 which we&apos;ve avoided using in the past [0].  In addition, the codes are non-contiguous which also seems to be non-standard.  We should re-map the exception numbers into something contiguous that doesn&apos;t overlap with other exception codes.


[0] I&apos;m not sure if 0 is actually specced to be reserved, but in practice it seems to be.  And WebKit uses 0 internally to signal &quot;no exception&quot;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46493</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jeremy Orlow">jorlow</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-08 01:19:26 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This was somewhat done at some point.  And any further cleanup should probably wait until exception/error stuff upstream in WebIDL is settled.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>