11251 2010-11-07 06:24:37 +0000 minor editorial improvement : improvements to section "3.8.1 The Model Group Schema Component" 2010-11-12 16:45:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Structures: XSD Part 1 1.1 only All All RESOLVED WORKSFORME P2 normal --- 1 gandhi.mukul David_E3 cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 42221 0 gandhi.mukul 2010-11-07 06:24:37 +0000 In the latest XML Schema 1.1 WD at, http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.omni.20101029.html I am able to suggest following improvements to one of the language texts, In the section "3.8.1 The Model Group Schema Component" it's said: <quote> When two or more element declarations contained ·directly·, ·indirectly·, or ·implicitly· in the {particles} of a model group have identical names, the type definitions of those declarations must be the same. </quote> I think this description is probably wrong. The above text seems to convey that, element declarations having same name must be validated by the same schema type (in this case, the element declarations belong to model group -- but to my opinion, that doesn't make difference to relationship between an element declaration and it's schema type with any other case like xs:element being child of xs:sequence for example). It probably seems appropriate to me, that the above cited text (within <quote>) is not at all needed -- so I recommend it to be deleted from the cited section. 42492 1 David_E3 2010-11-12 16:45:35 +0000 The WG examined this issue, and it appears that the text is correct, if slightly redundant. It's re-explaining Element Delcaration Consistent. Therefore, we are resolving this bug as WORKSFORME.