11186 2010-11-01 10:13:22 +0000 forms: <input type=url multiple> and <input type=tel multiple> 2014-10-01 02:20:23 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WHATWG HTML unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19042 P3 enhancement Needs Impl Interest 1 contributor ian cvp ian mike mounir public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking robin public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 41917 0 contributor 2010-11-01 10:13:22 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-input-required Comment: Why multiple is left out of URL/Telephone? Text/Search do not need multiple but URL and Telephone can really use the multiple attribute. Posted from: 123.49.21.247 42270 1 mounir 2010-11-08 13:20:53 +0000 <input type='text'> could use it too for keywords list for example. 42656 2 cvp 2010-11-20 13:15:44 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-input-required > > Comment: > Why multiple is left out of URL/Telephone? Text/Search do not need multiple > but URL and Telephone can really use the multiple attribute. > > Posted from: 123.49.21.247 I reported the original. It seems I made a mistake. Correct Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attr-input-multiple Yes, input type text can use it too for keywords/tags fields. 43689 3 ian 2010-12-31 07:21:13 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: none yet Rationale: This may be a good idea, but before adding this feature we should wait to see how well type=email/multiple works. If it works well, then we should consider adding it elsewhere. If it confuses people, or if implementations end up too buggy, etc, then we should abandon the idea. 54063 4 mike 2011-08-04 05:35:45 +0000 mass-move component to LC1 82042 5 public-rdfa-wg 2013-01-24 06:56:57 +0000 This bug was cloned to create HTML WG bug 19042. 94134 6 ian 2013-10-01 23:30:05 +0000 <input type=email multiple> has not been a roaring success, UI wise. I'm punting on this until it's more solidly implemented with prettier and more functional UIs. 112512 7 ian 2014-10-01 02:20:23 +0000 Given the continued lack of success with type=email multiple, I'm punting on this. If an implementor decides they want to take a crack at it, please don't hesitate to reopen this bug or file a new one.