11182 2010-10-31 13:30:53 +0000 "tag" link relation underspecified 2011-08-04 05:01:55 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED WONTFIX http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#link-type-tag P2 normal --- 1 julian.reschke ian ayg ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 41885 0 julian.reschke 2010-10-31 13:30:53 +0000 The spec currently says: "The tag keyword indicates that the tag that the referenced document represents applies to the current document." I think this can be said to *any* link. This really needs more prose. 43582 1 ian 2010-12-27 23:53:01 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I'm happy to add more prose if you can suggest some, but as far as I can tell the description is complete and accurate. I strongly disagree that what the current description applies to any document, since few documents describe tags, for one. 45712 2 julian.reschke 2011-02-16 15:20:15 +0000 I confess that when I raised the bug I read the description incorrectly. It seems ok, although of course more meat wouldn't hurt. 52485 3 mike 2011-08-04 05:01:55 +0000 mass-moved component to LC1