1110 2005-02-07 20:35:11 +0000 When a copy expression references a variable that has not been set, what should happen? 2005-08-02 14:01:15 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Feb/0004.html P2 normal -- 1 gritzinger martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 4270 0 gritzinger 2005-02-07 20:35:11 +0000 When a copy expression references a variable that has not been set, what should happen. The assign activity talks about the assign only succeeding if all of the copies succeed, otherwise the target variables are not affected. Does this mean that if one of the copies attempts to use an unset variable that it will fail, and therefore the assign will fail - then what happens? Does the next activity following the assign get executed? 4064 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-15 21:05:16 +0000 agreed on con call 15-feb-05: requires discussion (applies in other places when a variable is used - e.g interect) 2751 2 steve 2005-06-13 15:25:15 +0000 PROPOSAL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Apr/0024.html PROPOSAL adopt with insertion of uninitialzied at the start of the amendement above into section 2.4.2 4313 3 martin.chapman 2005-06-20 20:45:31 +0000 agreed wording at the June 2005 F2F: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jun/att- 0003/June_2005_F2F_minutes_-_0.txt 4346 4 gritzinger 2005-06-24 21:07:34 +0000 As per comments above. 4612 5 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 15:57:46 +0000 group notification of status change: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member- ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html 5325 6 martin.chapman 2005-08-02 14:01:15 +0000 no comments from group so closed confirmed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html