11091 2010-10-19 12:38:27 +0000 Clarify whether importNode copies the 'already executed' flag 2011-08-04 05:00:38 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML5 spec unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED P1 critical --- 1 hsivonen ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 41544 0 hsivonen 2010-10-19 12:38:27 +0000 See http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/moz/scripts/xhr-importNode.html In Gecko, it seems the 'already executed' flag is copied. In WebKit, it seems it isn't copied. Opera seems to execute the script because 'already executed' hasn't been set in the first place: http://hsivonen.iki.fi/test/moz/scripts/xhr.html IE9 beta1 seems to be unable to either adopt or import nodes from a non-ActiveX XHR doc into a doc in a browsing context. Please define the correct behavior for importNode in this case. In any case, it would be a bad idea to copy the 'parser-inserted' flag. 43556 1 ian 2010-12-26 20:18:21 +0000 importNode() doesn't do anything at all, does it? I thought we were dropping that API entirely as a no-op. 43560 2 zcorpan 2010-12-27 09:33:13 +0000 "The importNode(node, deep) method must return a clone of node, with new ownerDocument being the context node, and the clone children flag set if deep is true." http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-domcore-20101007/#dom-document-importnode 45305 3 ian 2011-02-09 00:42:34 +0000 Oh, right, I was thinking of adoptNode(). EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments. (I made it the same as cloneNode(), for sanity.) 45306 4 contributor 2011-02-09 00:43:33 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r5863. Check-in comment: Clarify that the cloning that occurs for importNode() is the same as occurs for cloneNode(). http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5862&to=5863 52355 5 mike 2011-08-04 05:00:38 +0000 mass-moved component to LC1