1109 2005-02-07 20:34:17 +0000 Remote reads with cdL:getVariable (clarification) 2005-08-02 14:00:51 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Feb/0003.html P2 normal -- 1 gritzinger martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 4269 0 gritzinger 2005-02-07 20:34:17 +0000 Here is another comment, on variables: In 2.4.6 b (this is workunit section) and elsewhere, there are several sentences which can be read as if "cdL:getVariable" can be performed to obtain a variable from any other role, resulting in fetching the value of a variable at a remote site. In 2.4.6b we find: ...the guard condition checks if the Variable "StockQuantity" at the "Retailer" Role is available and is greater than .... If in the given workunit, an action by Seller is done and it is Retailer's datum used for guards, then this results in a remote read. Claritication of this point during the final inspection period will be useful. 4063 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-15 21:03:41 +0000 agreed on con call 15-feb-05: Editorial possible duplicate 2952 2 gritzinger 2005-05-27 17:47:35 +0000 Clarification requested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Mar/0029.html but no response yet. On telecom 26 April 05 it was clarified that the optional roleType parameter is used to specify the role[Type] when this is not otherwise clear from the context, but the getVariable function can not be used to do a remote value fetch. In section 2.4.6 changed · The WS-CDL function getVariable is used in the guard or repetition condition to obtain the information of a Variable To · The WS-CDL function getVariable is used in the guard or repetition condition to obtain the value of a Variable at the specific role (i.e. it can not be used to perform a remote value fetch) 4629 3 martin.chapman 2005-07-14 16:22:00 +0000 group notification of status change: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member- ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html 5324 4 martin.chapman 2005-08-02 14:00:51 +0000 no comments from group so closed confirmed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Jul/0004.html