<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>11072</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2010-10-16 17:38:35 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>CTA - &quot;Base information set properties&quot;</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2011-01-23 18:28:49 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Schema</product>
          <component>Structures: XSD Part 1</component>
          <version>1.1 only</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>resolved</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="David Ezell">David_E3</assigned_to>
          <cc>cmsmcq</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="XML Schema comments list">www-xml-schema-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>41456</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2010-10-16 17:38:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In discussing how CTA tests are evaluated in 3.12.4, the specification speaks of copying the &quot;base information set properties&quot; of certain nodes, including the element information item itself.

It&apos;s not clear what exactly is meant by the &quot;base information set properties&quot;. I was trying to find out how namespaces are handled, and one can justify copying all in-scope namespaces on the basis that the properties of an EII include [namespace attributes] and [in-scope namespaces]. However, the properties also include [parent], which clearly should not be copied, as well as [attributes] and [children] which are covered by more specific statements.

It should also perhaps be made clear that the [references] property of an attribute information item is not copied.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>41691</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="David Ezell">David_E3</who>
    <bug_when>2010-10-22 16:27:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>see minutes from the telcon</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>44302</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2011-01-12 23:22:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A wording proposal intended to resolve this issue is now on the server at

  http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.b11072.html
  (member-only link)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>44595</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2011-01-22 00:52:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>On the call of 21 January 2011 the WG approved the wording proposal mentioned in comment 2.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>44628</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="C. M. Sperberg-McQueen">cmsmcq</who>
    <bug_when>2011-01-23 16:17:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The proposal mentioned in comment 2 has now been integrated into the status-quo documents pointed to from http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xsd-ed-pointers.html (member-only link).
Accordingly I&apos;m marking this issue resolved.

Michael, if you would close it to signal your agreement with the result, or reopen it to signal disagreement?  Thank you.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>