10977 2010-10-05 02:12:22 +0000 Properties should be on prototypes, not on objects, in the ECMAScript binding 2010-10-06 22:41:19 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG WebIDL unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 bzbarsky cam annevk mike public-webapps public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 40617 0 bzbarsky 2010-10-05 02:12:22 +0000 DOM properties should be on prototypes and defined in terms of getter/setter pairs; that would allow page scripts to override property implementations as needed. This should be doable with an ES5 formulation of the ECMAScript binding. 40625 1 annevk 2010-10-05 10:02:18 +0000 The event handler IDL attributes are special though, right? 40634 2 bzbarsky 2010-10-05 15:06:33 +0000 Why? (I mean... they could be; and I think in Gecko right now they are, but do they have to be?) 40638 3 annevk 2010-10-05 15:49:09 +0000 I do not know whether they have to be. If they can be consistent that would be great. 40750 4 cam 2010-10-06 22:21:22 +0000 Done for attributes on interfaces: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.220&r2=1.221&f=h http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-attributes Still to do exception members. 40753 5 cam 2010-10-06 22:41:19 +0000 And done for exceptions now too: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.221&r2=1.222&f=h