<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1083</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-02-07 15:40:26 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Deprecation in case of WCAG 1.0/WCAG 2.0</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-04-28 11:53:50 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>QA</product>
          <component>QASpec-GL</component>
          <version>LC-2004-11-22</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>REMIND</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Feb/0005.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>LC, SpecGL</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Karl Dubost">karl</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Karl Dubost">karl</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Karl Dubost">karl</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4242</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Karl Dubost">karl</who>
    <bug_when>2005-02-07 15:40:26 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>[[[
About section: 4.4 Requirement A - &quot;deprecated features&quot;
Does &quot;Mapping Between WCAG 1.0 and the WCAG 2.0 Working Draft&quot; [2]
satisfy this requirement? Some of the WCAG 1.0 Checkpoints have evolved
into WCAG 2.0 Techniques while others are likely to be deprecated.
However, because the style is so different between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG
2.0, we are not able to include WCAG 1.0 Checkpoints directly in WCAG
2.0 in a way that makes sense and would allow us to mark them as
deprecated (in the WCAG 2.0 spec).
[2] &lt;http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2004/11/19-mapping.html
]]]</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3829</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-04-08 08:08:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Documents are very different and mapping between the two is neither easy nor
direct. One possibility is to declare 2.0 as a new document and not a revision
of 1.0. This avoids the issue. Think this mapping may be difficult but important
that people know the evolution of a feature. Suggest there be an appendix with
the mapping, showing and explaining the evolution. Use whatever format works.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>3665</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dominique Hazael-Massieux">dom</who>
    <bug_when>2005-04-28 11:53:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>setting version to LC in case of future use</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>