1077 2005-02-07 15:08:18 +0000 Add enforcement level to the silent action specification 2005-05-26 19:19:20 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS Choreography Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed unspecified PC Linux CLOSED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0037.html P2 normal -- 1 gritzinger martin.chapman martin.chapman oldest_to_newest 4236 0 gritzinger 2005-02-07 15:08:18 +0000 2.5.5 Marking Silent Actions The Silent Action activity is an explicit designator used for marking the point where party specific actions with non-observable operational details MUST be performed" Suggestion: Add enforcement level (may,should, must, besteffort, resonable effort to the silent action specification. Rationale: The MUST modality is only one of several enforcement levels traditionally used and specified. MUST may provide to hard requirements and may deter users to at all specify silent actions. After all how does one enforce an unobservable and maybe under-specified action? Otherwise this mechanism provides a hook into business semantics which is appreciatd and usefull. 4036 1 martin.chapman 2005-02-14 21:38:20 +0000 From 8-feb-05 concall: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Feb/att-0003/Minutes- 02082005-0.txt ASSIGN TO PRIMER with example 3439 2 martin.chapman 2005-05-10 16:33:20 +0000 Anders has been informed of the group's decision [1] and we are awaiting confirmation. Category changed to LCC: Closed. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor- comments/2005May/0016.html 3088 3 martin.chapman 2005-05-26 19:19:20 +0000 Anders agrees with the resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005May/0032.html