10741 2010-09-26 00:37:20 +0000 align @extension with @vendor--feature (Rob Ennals's ISSUE-41 prop) 2010-10-04 14:55:37 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC All RESOLVED NEEDSINFO http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/infrastructure#extensibility P3 normal LC 1 xn--mlform-iua ian ian julian.reschke mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 39422 0 xn--mlform-iua 2010-09-26 00:37:20 +0000 Rob Ennals's Change Proposal suggests that foreign namespaces not officially part of HTML5, must have an @extension attribute: <my-root-element xmlns="http://my-name-space/" extension="extension" > However, in light of the @vendor--feature construct (or @_vendor-feature, bug 9590 is still open), it seems reasonable to let the @extension attribute follow the same shape. E.g. instead of @extension one could use @xml--ns <my-root-element xmlns="http://my-name-space/" xml--ns="xml--ns" > 39691 1 ian 2010-09-28 07:20:34 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I don't understand. What part of the spec are you suggesting should be changed?