10665 2010-09-21 00:29:42 +0000 These tables should include obsolete elements somewhere, for the benefit of implementers. Or at least some such index should be provided. It's annoying to have no easily-used index like this when writing tests. 2010-10-04 14:33:24 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other CLOSED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attributes-1 P3 normal --- 1 contributor ian ayg ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 39123 0 contributor 2010-09-21 00:29:42 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#attributes-1 Comment: These tables should include obsolete elements somewhere, for the benefit of implementers. Or at least some such index should be provided. It's annoying to have no easily-used index like this when writing tests. Posted from: 68.175.61.233 39839 1 ian 2010-09-28 23:39:15 +0000 What would such an index have? Send me an HTML file in the pre-anolis format for a section with whatever it is you want, and I can add it. Contact me on IRC if you want help with it. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: It's not clear what exactly the reporter wants, and I don't really want to write an index, as that is tedious work. Maybe ms2ger still likes writing them, you might try asking him. :-) 40015 2 ayg 2010-09-29 20:50:10 +0000 Producing such an index would require me to not be lazy, and if I weren't lazy I wouldn't have asked in the first place. It was worth a try.