10658 2010-09-20 13:03:21 +0000 Lexical mapping for midnight is missing 2010-11-25 08:01:32 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only PC Windows NT CLOSED FIXED decided P2 normal --- 1 mike David_E3 cmsmcq davep www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 39112 0 mike 2010-09-20 13:03:21 +0000 In part 2, Section 3.3.9.2 (xs:time) asserts: "The ·lexical mapping· maps '00:00:00' and '24:00:00' to the same value, namely midnight (·hour· = 0 , ·minute· = 0 , ·second· = 0)." However, the lexical mapping given in function timeLexicalMap() does not appear to do this; it gives no mapping to a value when endOfDayFrag is used. Similarly for xs:dateTime. 39118 1 davep 2010-09-20 17:50:15 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > However, the lexical mapping given in function timeLexicalMap() does not appear > to do this; it gives no mapping to a value when endOfDayFrag is used. > > Similarly for xs:dateTime. It appears I screwed up--amazing no one caught it before. Will try to have a fix by next week's WG phone meeting. :-( 40433 2 David_E3 2010-10-01 14:21:11 +0000 At the telcon on 2010-09-24 the WG decided: 1) to adopt an ammendment proposed in this email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2010Sep/0007.html, i.e. "D+1), 0, 0, 0," to "D), 24, 0, 0," 2) to recast the notes in Appendices E.3.5 and D.2.2, since special handling for EOD frag no longer forces values to zero (MSM). 3) remove the parentheses from these same notes and mark them in the usual way for notes. 4) adopt the following rewording of the text: LEX necessarily includes substrings that are instances of yearFrag, monthFrag, and dayFrags (below referred to as Y, MO, and D respectively); it also contains either instances of hourFrag, minuteFrag, and secondFrag (Y, MI, and S), or else an instance of endOfDayFrag; finally, it may optionally contain an instance of timezoneFrag (T). 42766 3 cmsmcq 2010-11-25 00:41:24 +0000 The changes described in comment 2 have been made in the (member-accessible) status-quo version of the document; to reflect that fact, I'm marking this issue as resolved. [To the originator of the comment:] If you are content with the disposition of the comment, you can as originator close the issue to signal your contentment. If for some reason you are unhappy, please re-open the issue and explain what's wrong. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks or so, we'll assume that you are happy with the outcome.