10650 2010-09-18 10:47:27 +0000 minor editorial improvement : fundamental facets{ordering} 2010-11-25 12:44:49 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only All All CLOSED FIXED http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/ decided P2 trivial --- 1 gandhi.mukul David_E3 cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 39095 0 gandhi.mukul 2010-09-18 10:47:27 +0000 In the description at section 4.2.1 (ordered -> "fundamental facets") in XML Schema 1.1 data types spec, there's a paragraph: <quote> Mathematically, any set of values possesses least one trivial partial ordering, in which every value pair that is not equal is incomparable. </quote> Perhaps this could be improved as follows: "Mathematically, any set of values possesses at-least one trivial partial ordering, in which every value pair that is not equal is incomparable." I find word "at-least" better than "least" here. 40434 1 David_E3 2010-10-01 14:22:40 +0000 at the telcon on 2010-09-24, the WG decided to change "least" to "at least" 42765 2 cmsmcq 2010-11-25 00:38:13 +0000 The change described has been made in the (member-accessible) status-quo version of the document; to reflect that fact, I'm marking this issue as resolved. [To the originator of the comment:] If you are content with the disposition of the comment, you can as originator close the issue to signal your contentment. If for some reason you are unhappy, please re-open the issue and explain what's wrong. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks or so, we'll assume that you are happy with the outcome. Thank you for your observant and helpful suggestion. 42775 3 gandhi.mukul 2010-11-25 12:44:49 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > The change described has been made in the (member-accessible) status-quo > version > of the document; to reflect that fact, I'm marking this issue as resolved. > > [To the originator of the comment:] If you are content with the disposition of > the > comment, you can as originator close the issue to signal your contentment. If > for some reason you are unhappy, please re-open the issue and explain what's > wrong. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks or so, we'll assume > that > you are happy with the outcome. > > Thank you for your observant and helpful suggestion. I trust that this change was done. I'm marking this issue closed. Thanks.