<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1064</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-01-27 15:14:34 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>WSDL dilemma about outbound operations not fully resolved</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-07-18 17:42:06 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS Choreography</product>
          <component>Last Call Comment: Confirmed Closed</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jan/0025.html</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>--</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</assigned_to>
          
          
          <qa_contact name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2919</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Greg Ritzinger">gritzinger</who>
    <bug_when>2005-01-27 15:14:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think your group has not fully 
resolved the WSDL dilemma about outbound operations. I had raised that 
before, it might be that I don&apos;t understand, but you are limiting all 
WSDLs to have inbound operations only (note that this is a 
recommendation of WS-I). So, I did not see how in the interaction 
element you could actually specify that this outbound operation maps 
to this inbound operation. We are supporting this in ebBP (we call it 
operation mapping). We can map any combination of operations to an 
ebBP business transaction and we can also map WS operatoins together, 
from one party to another.

JJ-</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4204</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2005-02-14 21:30:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From 8-feb-05 concall:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2005Feb/att-0003/Minutes-
02082005-0.txt

left open subject to response from JJ
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4042</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Charlton Barreto">charlton_b</who>
    <bug_when>2005-02-15 18:01:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>After discussing with JJ, we&apos;ve clarified that the issue he&apos;s raised is how does
one specify the mapping between outbound and inbound operations (or inbound and
outbound operations) in a CDL.

I&apos;ve indicated that any and all such mapping details are not the domain of CDL,
but delegated to lower-layer specifications/stacks (WSDL, WS-Addressing, BPEL,
etc.) which carry such responsibilities. 

We are in agreement that CDL is not the level at which one specifies mapping. JJ
in the meantime will review the other involved specifications to better clarify
when and where such mapping takes place. </thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4068</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Charlton Barreto">charlton_b</who>
    <bug_when>2005-02-16 23:45:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>After discussion with JJ we are in agreement on the following w.r.t. issue #1064:

- We agree that issue #1064 concerns where mapping between operations is defined
and how is this mapping performed in CDL.
- We agree that mapping between operations is outside the scope of CDL and
delegated to underlying specificiations (XSLT, XPath, WSDL, WS-Addressing, BPEL,
etc.).
- We agree that further review of these other, underlying specifications may be
necessary to further clarify how and where mapping is performed.
- We agree that either of both of us would raise any issues w.r.t. mapping with
these specifications with their respective WG/TCs.

As such I am marking this issue as &quot;FIXED&quot;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>4803</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Martin Chapman">martin.chapman</who>
    <bug_when>2005-07-18 17:42:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>JJ has been informed of the resolution and has confirmed it is acceptable:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor-comments/2005Jul/0010.html</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>