10609 2010-09-12 13:00:03 +0000 DOMTimeStamp should be defined in Web IDL 2010-10-28 04:44:40 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WebAppsWG WebIDL unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 annevk cam mike public-webapps public-webapps-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 38908 0 annevk 2010-09-12 13:00:03 +0000 Since DOMString is also in Web IDL, DOMTimeStamp should move there too. (Maybe with advice that people should use date instead?) 38915 1 annevk 2010-09-12 14:12:51 +0000 Tentatively removed from Web DOM Core. 41512 2 cam 2010-10-19 03:40:53 +0000 I'm thinking DOMTimeStamp should just be a typedef to unsigned long long (or a uint53_t if such a type were introduced) with no special binding in JS (it would just be a Number). You would need dates that exceed the year 200,000 before the precision of Number is an issue. A separate Date type (name tbd) could be introduced for things like HTMLTimeElement.valueAsDate. 41530 3 annevk 2010-10-19 07:48:10 +0000 That works for me. I was going to suggest naming it just "timestamp" but since we "cannot" rename DOMString we might as well keep it as DOMTimeStamp. 41800 4 cam 2010-10-28 04:44:40 +0000 Added DOMTimeStamp to a new "Common definitions" section of Web IDL: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#common-DOMTimeStamp